1,075 cited runs of 15,782 observed answer runs.
Machine Relations IndexCitation rate6.81% Days observed116/125 Engine breadth6 ConfidenceConfidence A
Source domain profile · Community and social platform
LinkedIn in the Machine Relations Index
linkedin.com appeared as a cited source in 1,075 of 15,782 monitored answer runs (6.81%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18.
Days cited and days observed in the current release window.
chatgpt, claude, gemini, google_ai_mode, google_ai_overviews, perplexity. This is an observed-engine list, not a per-engine rate.
MRI confidence is not an Answer-Source Fidelity grade.
Standing
Population ranks from the public release
- Public standing
- #3 of 22,179 observed domains
- Full universe
- #3 of 22,179
- Source role population
- #2 of 27
- Evidence-qualified source role
- #2 of 10
Segment evidence
Observed category and question-shape rows
Segment rates use the exact category/question-shape denominator. Collecting rows show sample progress only; null or missing rates are not rendered as 0%.
| Category | Question shape | State | Cited runs | Observed runs | Run dates | Rate | Confidence | Rank population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Infrastructure | Best tools | Published | 10 | 77 | 7 | 12.99% | Unavailable | #13 of 204 |
| AI Infrastructure | How buyers choose | Published | 10 | 106 | 7 | 9.43% | Unavailable | #14 of 258 |
| AI Infrastructure | Is it worth it | Published | 18 | 106 | 7 | 16.98% | Unavailable | #6 of 265 |
| AI Infrastructure | Problem-first research | Published | 14 | 106 | 7 | 13.21% | Unavailable | #6 of 212 |
| AI Infrastructure | Top lists | Published | 4 | 108 | 7 | 3.70% | Unavailable | #56 of 270 |
| AI Infrastructure | Comparisons | Published | 14 | 108 | 7 | 12.96% | Unavailable | #9 of 231 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Best tools | Published | 9 | 136 | 7 | 6.62% | Unavailable | #32 of 275 |
| AI Security & Privacy | How buyers choose | Published | 12 | 130 | 7 | 9.23% | Unavailable | #15 of 305 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Is it worth it | Published | 14 | 130 | 7 | 10.77% | Unavailable | #10 of 330 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Problem-first research | Published | 12 | 106 | 7 | 11.32% | Unavailable | #8 of 272 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Top lists | Published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #227 of 313 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Comparisons | Published | 6 | 114 | 7 | 5.26% | Unavailable | #23 of 263 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Best tools | Published | 7 | 113 | 7 | 6.19% | Unavailable | #37 of 351 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | How buyers choose | Published | 12 | 113 | 7 | 10.62% | Unavailable | #5 of 448 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Is it worth it | Published | 18 | 137 | 7 | 13.14% | Unavailable | #7 of 467 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Problem-first research | Published | 31 | 132 | 7 | 23.48% | Unavailable | #3 of 420 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Top lists | Published | 4 | 71 | 7 | 5.63% | Unavailable | #32 of 412 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Comparisons | Published | 27 | 132 | 7 | 20.45% | Unavailable | #4 of 417 |
| Consumer Finance | How buyers choose | Published | 1 | 132 | 7 | 0.76% | Unavailable | #151 of 191 |
| Consumer Finance | Is it worth it | Published | 6 | 132 | 7 | 4.55% | Unavailable | #34 of 262 |
| Consumer Finance | Comparisons | Published | 2 | 138 | 7 | 1.45% | Unavailable | #79 of 170 |
| Consumer Health | How buyers choose | Published | 5 | 131 | 7 | 3.82% | Unavailable | #51 of 339 |
| Consumer Health | Problem-first research | Published | 3 | 131 | 7 | 2.29% | Unavailable | #68 of 227 |
| Consumer Health | Top lists | Published | 1 | 131 | 7 | 0.76% | Unavailable | #259 of 338 |
| Consumer Products | How buyers choose | Published | 1 | 137 | 7 | 0.73% | Unavailable | #303 of 427 |
| Cybersecurity | Best tools | Published | 1 | 75 | 7 | 1.33% | Unavailable | #152 of 213 |
| Cybersecurity | How buyers choose | Published | 8 | 131 | 7 | 6.11% | Unavailable | #17 of 325 |
| Cybersecurity | Is it worth it | Published | 5 | 131 | 7 | 3.82% | Unavailable | #50 of 227 |
| Cybersecurity | News-driven citations | Published | 40 | 623 | 54 | 6.42% | Unavailable | #9 of 1,340 |
| Cybersecurity | Problem-first research | Published | 9 | 125 | 7 | 7.20% | Unavailable | #11 of 263 |
| Cybersecurity | Top lists | Published | 3 | 130 | 7 | 2.31% | Unavailable | #111 of 264 |
| Cybersecurity | Comparisons | Published | 15 | 107 | 7 | 14.02% | Unavailable | #7 of 189 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Best tools | Published | 10 | 121 | 7 | 8.26% | Unavailable | #15 of 328 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | How buyers choose | Published | 17 | 130 | 7 | 13.08% | Unavailable | #8 of 195 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Is it worth it | Published | 11 | 105 | 7 | 10.48% | Unavailable | #9 of 181 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Problem-first research | Published | 7 | 104 | 7 | 6.73% | Unavailable | #12 of 157 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Top lists | Published | 2 | 106 | 7 | 1.89% | Unavailable | #136 of 279 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Comparisons | Published | 13 | 105 | 7 | 12.38% | Unavailable | #8 of 171 |
| Education & Training | Best tools | Published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #190 of 263 |
| Education & Training | How buyers choose | Published | 13 | 130 | 7 | 10.00% | Unavailable | #5 of 249 |
| Education & Training | Is it worth it | Published | 7 | 100 | 7 | 7.00% | Unavailable | #13 of 201 |
| Education & Training | Problem-first research | Published | 15 | 100 | 7 | 15.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 229 |
| Education & Training | Top lists | Published | 3 | 100 | 7 | 3.00% | Unavailable | #75 of 295 |
| Education & Training | Comparisons | Published | 2 | 100 | 7 | 2.00% | Unavailable | #66 of 126 |
| Emergent Prosumer | How buyers choose | Published | 1 | 100 | 7 | 1.00% | Unavailable | #152 of 192 |
| Emergent Prosumer | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 95 | 7 | 1.05% | Unavailable | #95 of 118 |
| Enterprise Software | Best tools | Published | 6 | 101 | 7 | 5.94% | Unavailable | #28 of 167 |
| Enterprise Software | How buyers choose | Published | 8 | 99 | 7 | 8.08% | Unavailable | #14 of 172 |
| Enterprise Software | Is it worth it | Published | 11 | 107 | 7 | 10.28% | Unavailable | #5 of 194 |
| Enterprise Software | News-driven citations | Published | 66 | 596 | 53 | 11.07% | Unavailable | #1 of 1,375 |
| Enterprise Software | Problem-first research | Published | 8 | 106 | 7 | 7.55% | Unavailable | #4 of 258 |
| Enterprise Software | Top lists | Published | 4 | 114 | 7 | 3.51% | Unavailable | #60 of 264 |
| Enterprise Software | Comparisons | Published | 18 | 114 | 7 | 15.79% | Unavailable | #2 of 186 |
| Family Software | Top lists | Published | 1 | 108 | 7 | 0.93% | Unavailable | #164 of 195 |
| Fintech | Best tools | Published | 2 | 108 | 7 | 1.85% | Unavailable | #102 of 224 |
| Fintech | How buyers choose | Published | 7 | 102 | 7 | 6.86% | Unavailable | #18 of 170 |
| Fintech | Is it worth it | Published | 8 | 108 | 7 | 7.41% | Unavailable | #10 of 206 |
| Fintech | News-driven citations | Published | 63 | 616 | 53 | 10.23% | Unavailable | #1 of 1,531 |
| Fintech | Problem-first research | Published | 11 | 102 | 7 | 10.78% | Unavailable | #3 of 171 |
| Fintech | Top lists | Published | 4 | 102 | 7 | 3.92% | Unavailable | #43 of 200 |
| Fintech | Comparisons | Published | 17 | 102 | 7 | 16.67% | Unavailable | #2 of 136 |
| Healthcare Services | Best tools | Collecting observations | 3 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Healthcare Services | How buyers choose | Collecting observations | 1 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Healthcare Services | Is it worth it | Collecting observations | 3 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Healthcare Services | News-driven citations | Published | 56 | 613 | 53 | 9.14% | Unavailable | #5 of 1,264 |
| Healthcare Services | Problem-first research | Collecting observations | 4 | 102 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Healthcare Services | Top lists | Collecting observations | 3 | 78 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Healthcare Services | Comparisons | Collecting observations | 4 | 72 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| HR & Talent | Best tools | Collecting observations | 1 | 72 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| HR & Talent | How buyers choose | Collecting observations | 10 | 71 | 5 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| HR & Talent | Is it worth it | Collecting observations | 2 | 66 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| HR & Talent | News-driven citations | Published | 43 | 608 | 53 | 7.07% | Unavailable | #10 of 1,249 |
| HR & Talent | Problem-first research | Collecting observations | 11 | 65 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| HR & Talent | Comparisons | Collecting observations | 3 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| iGaming & Betting | Best tools | Collecting observations | 5 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| iGaming & Betting | How buyers choose | Collecting observations | 2 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| iGaming & Betting | Is it worth it | Collecting observations | 2 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| iGaming & Betting | Problem-first research | Collecting observations | 1 | 30 | 1 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| iGaming & Betting | Top lists | Collecting observations | 1 | 29 | 1 | Unavailable | Unavailable | No mature rank |
| Legacy News Topics | News-driven citations | Published | 211 | 2,138 | 54 | 9.87% | Unavailable | #1 of 4,025 |
| Martech & Advertising | News-driven citations | Published | 49 | 602 | 53 | 8.14% | Unavailable | #9 of 1,244 |
Published segments: 65. Collecting segments: 16.
Release and boundary
How to cite this profile
LinkedIn (linkedin.com), 6.81% citation rate, 1,075 of 15,782 monitored answer runs, 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18, mri_score_v2.0, mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a, https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/linkedin.com.
Release mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a; methodology mri_score_v2.0; generated 2026-09-18; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18; artifact 8fa38e54dd0a.
The public dataset reports citation rates, rankings, and evidence counts. It excludes internal query identifiers, raw cited URLs, and answer-engine provider payloads. MRI measures observed root-domain citations in monitored prompts, not all AI answers, recommendation quality, web traffic or commercial performance. A citation is not source support.
AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection is a downstream practitioner projection. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.