Machine Relations Index

Consumer Products · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Consumer Products questions

Editorial publications earn 70.5% of classified citations in Consumer Products answers (2,102 of 2,982), as of November 2, 2026.

In the November 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index, these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 Consumer Products question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best consumer products tools. 280 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 441ForbesEditorial publication29.64%83 of 280
#2 of 441Whowhatwear.comOther observed source16.79%47 of 280
#3 of 441RedditCommunity and social platform16.43%46 of 280
#4 of 441AllureEditorial publication15.36%43 of 280
#5 of 441The New York TimesEditorial publication14.64%41 of 280

Full Best tools leaderboard, 441 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose consumer products tools. 285 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 650Livetinted.comOther observed source18.60%53 of 285
#2 of 650YouTubeSearch or media platform15.44%44 of 285
#3 of 650RedditCommunity and social platform12.63%36 of 285
#4 of 650Koraorganics.comOther observed source9.82%28 of 285
#5 of 650AllureEditorial publication8.42%24 of 285

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 650 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is consumer products software worth it. 283 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 345Alibaba.comOther observed source20.14%57 of 283
#2 of 345RedditCommunity and social platform15.90%45 of 283
#3 of 345Daily HarvestOther observed source14.49%41 of 283
#4 of 345YouTubeSearch or media platform13.78%39 of 283
#5 of 345WIREDEditorial publication9.89%28 of 283

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 345 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve consumer products problems. 279 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 347Dialavet.comOther observed source14.34%40 of 279
#2 of 347RedditCommunity and social platform13.98%39 of 279
#3 of 347YouTubeSearch or media platform13.26%37 of 279
#4 of 347Petco.comOther observed source10.75%30 of 279
#5 of 347Petmd.comOther observed source10.04%28 of 279

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 347 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top consumer products platforms. 276 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 566Dogfoodadvisor.comOther observed source18.84%52 of 276
#2 of 566ForbesEditorial publication18.12%50 of 276
#3 of 566Chewy.comOther observed source16.30%45 of 276
#4 of 566The Good TradeEditorial publication15.94%44 of 276
#5 of 566Walmart.comOther observed source12.68%35 of 276

Full Top lists leaderboard, 566 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: consumer products platform A vs B. 275 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 375Petmd.comOther observed source22.91%63 of 275
#2 of 375YouTubeSearch or media platform20.73%57 of 275
#3 of 375RedditCommunity and social platform17.82%49 of 275
#4 of 375Seed.comOther observed source14.55%40 of 275
#5 of 375ForbesEditorial publication14.18%39 of 275

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 375 sources

Observed shapes6

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published6

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

ReleaseNovember 2, 2026

Methodology v2.1.

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesDistinct cited domainsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished2807 (5 paraphrase groups)12441Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished2857 (5 paraphrase groups)12650Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished2837 (5 paraphrase groups)12345Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished2797 (5 paraphrase groups)12347Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished2767 (5 paraphrase groups)12566Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished2757 (5 paraphrase groups)12375Open leaderboard

By answer engine

Whole-window rates on each engine

Each link ranks sources with a published Consumer Products segment by that source's citation rate on one engine across the whole window. It is not a rate inside Consumer Products alone. A collecting engine has no published ranking for this category.
Cite this
Citation
Machine Relations Index (MRI), Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai. Consumer Products, observed Machine Relations Index category, 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-02. Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15. https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products. CC BY 4.0.
APA
Parrott, J. (2026). Consumer Products in the Machine Relations Index (Version mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15) [Data set]. Machine Relations Research. https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423
BibTeX
@misc{parrott2026mriconsumerproducts,
  author = {Parrott, Jaxon},
  title = {Consumer Products in the Machine Relations Index},
  year = {2026},
  version = {mri\_score\_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15},
  publisher = {Machine Relations Research},
  url = {https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23652423},
  license = {CC-BY-4.0},
  note = {Machine Relations Index (MRI), Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai}
}

CITATION.cff

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Published November 2, 2026. The observation window runs May 10, 2026 to November 2, 2026. Methodology v2.1.

Use the data
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json" -o machine-relations-index.json
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json" -o mri-release-manifest.json
curl -fsSL "https://huggingface.co/datasets/machine-relations/machine-relations-index/resolve/main/domains.csv" -o domains.csv
curl -fsSL -L "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423" -o mri-zenodo.html
import json
from urllib.request import urlopen

index_url = "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json"
with urlopen(index_url) as response:
    index = json.load(response)
print(index["generated"], index["total_domains"])

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Consumer Products buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or an identity link for the neutral dataset.