Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.
Machine Relations Index
Observed shapes6 Published6 Collecting0 Release2026-10-16
AI Security & Privacy · Machine Relations Index category
Which sources AI engines cite for AI Security & Privacy questions
In the October 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index (mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3), these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 AI Security & Privacy question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.
Top sources by question shape
The sources engines cite most, shape by shape
A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.Best tools
Example pattern: best AI security privacy tools. 224 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 389 | Arxiv.org | Academic and government source | 35.71% | 80 of 224 |
| #2 of 389 | Getmaxim.ai | Other observed source | 26.34% | 59 of 224 |
| #3 of 389 | Medium | Community and social platform | 20.98% | 47 of 224 |
| #4 of 389 | Futureagi.com | Other observed source | 17.86% | 40 of 224 |
| #5 of 389 | Galileo.ai | Other observed source | 15.18% | 34 of 224 |
How buyers choose
Example pattern: how to choose AI security privacy tools. 219 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 415 | Teramind.co | Other observed source | 21.00% | 46 of 219 |
| #2 of 415 | Philterd.ai | Other observed source | 15.98% | 35 of 219 |
| #3 of 415 | Aona.ai | Other observed source | 15.07% | 33 of 219 |
| #4 of 415 | Arxiv.org | Academic and government source | 14.61% | 32 of 219 |
| #5 of 415 | Strac.io | Vendor-owned source | 12.33% | 27 of 219 |
Is it worth it
Example pattern: is AI security privacy software worth it. 219 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 456 | Witness.ai | Other observed source | 16.89% | 37 of 219 |
| #2 of 456 | Ovaledge.com | Other observed source | 16.44% | 36 of 219 |
| #3 of 456 | Veeam.com | Other observed source | 14.16% | 31 of 219 |
| #4 of 456 | Radware.com | Other observed source | 12.33% | 27 of 219 |
| #5 of 456 | Cloudflare.com | Other observed source | 11.87% | 26 of 219 |
Problem-first research
Example pattern: how to solve AI security privacy problems. 194 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 446 | Arxiv.org | Academic and government source | 14.95% | 29 of 194 |
| #2 of 446 | TechRadar | Editorial publication | 14.95% | 29 of 194 |
| #3 of 446 | Community and social platform | 11.86% | 23 of 194 | |
| #4 of 446 | Iguazio.com | Vendor-owned source | 11.34% | 22 of 194 |
| #5 of 446 | TechTarget | Editorial publication | 11.34% | 22 of 194 |
Top lists
Example pattern: top AI security privacy platforms. 194 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 431 | Ovaledge.com | Other observed source | 27.32% | 53 of 194 |
| #2 of 431 | Arxiv.org | Academic and government source | 26.29% | 51 of 194 |
| #3 of 431 | Osano.com | Other observed source | 20.62% | 40 of 194 |
| #4 of 431 | Ketch.com | Vendor-owned source | 18.56% | 36 of 194 |
| #5 of 431 | Usercentrics.com | Other observed source | 17.01% | 33 of 194 |
Comparisons
Example pattern: AI security privacy platform A vs B. 202 observed runs across 10 dates.
| Rank | Source | Source role | Citation rate | Cited runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 345 | Arxiv.org | Academic and government source | 40.59% | 82 of 202 |
| #2 of 345 | Medium | Community and social platform | 18.32% | 37 of 202 |
| #3 of 345 | Apxml.com | Other observed source | 15.84% | 32 of 202 |
| #4 of 345 | YouTube | Search or media platform | 11.88% | 24 of 202 |
| #5 of 345 | Bluedot.org | Other observed source | 10.89% | 22 of 202 |
Published segments met the release evidence floor.
Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.
mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3
Question shapes
Separate denominators by segment
| Question shape | State | Observed runs | Distinct questions | Run dates | Cited domain observations | Canonical segment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best tools | Published | 224 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 389 | Open leaderboard |
| How buyers choose | Published | 219 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 415 | Open leaderboard |
| Is it worth it | Published | 219 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 456 | Open leaderboard |
| Problem-first research | Published | 194 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 446 | Open leaderboard |
| Top lists | Published | 194 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 431 | Open leaderboard |
| Comparisons | Published | 202 | 7 (5 paraphrase groups) | 10 | 345 | Open leaderboard |
Release and boundary
No pooled category score
Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-10-16; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-16; artifact 676547a595a3.
This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.
AI Security & Privacy buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.