Machine Relations Index

Family Software · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Family Software questions

Editorial publications earn 69.4% of classified citations in Family Software answers (1,316 of 1,896), as of November 2, 2026.

In the November 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index, these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 Family Software question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best family software tools. 236 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 222TechRadarEditorial publication36.44%86 of 236
#2 of 222Tom's GuideEditorial publication29.66%70 of 236
#3 of 222Allaboutcookies.orgOther observed source25.42%60 of 236
#4 of 222Safetydetectives.comOther observed source20.34%48 of 236
#5 of 222Impulsec.comOther observed source19.92%47 of 236

Full Best tools leaderboard, 222 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose family software tools. 226 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 284Apple News (Syndication from Grit Daily)Other observed source16.37%37 of 226
#2 of 284Allaboutcookies.orgOther observed source15.49%35 of 226
#3 of 284Canopy.usOther observed source14.16%32 of 226
#4 of 284TechRadarEditorial publication11.50%26 of 226
#5 of 284The New York TimesEditorial publication10.62%24 of 226

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 284 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is family software software worth it. 230 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 212Impulsec.comOther observed source20.43%47 of 230
#2 of 212The New York TimesEditorial publication14.78%34 of 230
#3 of 212TechRadarEditorial publication13.91%32 of 230
#4 of 212Useboomerang.comOther observed source13.91%32 of 230
#5 of 212ForbesEditorial publication13.04%30 of 230

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 212 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve family software problems. 243 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 364Healthychildren.orgOther observed source17.28%42 of 243
#2 of 364Childmind.orgOther observed source10.70%26 of 243
#3 of 364RedditCommunity and social platform9.47%23 of 243
#4 of 364Mayoclinic.orgOther observed source7.82%19 of 243
#5 of 364YouTubeSearch or media platform7.82%19 of 243

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 364 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top family software platforms. 239 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 309Apple News (Syndication from Grit Daily)Other observed source29.29%70 of 239
#2 of 309Modakmakers.comOther observed source17.57%42 of 239
#3 of 309Spellingjoy.comOther observed source17.15%41 of 239
#4 of 309Kidkarma.appOther observed source14.23%34 of 239
#5 of 309Finder.comEditorial publication13.39%32 of 239

Full Top lists leaderboard, 309 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: family software platform A vs B. 240 observed runs across 12 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 158Useboomerang.comOther observed source26.25%63 of 240
#2 of 158Bark.usOther observed source21.25%51 of 240
#3 of 158Impulsec.comOther observed source17.92%43 of 240
#4 of 158Safewise.comOther observed source17.08%41 of 240
#5 of 158TechRadarEditorial publication16.25%39 of 240

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 158 sources

Observed shapes6

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published6

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

ReleaseNovember 2, 2026

Methodology v2.1.

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesDistinct cited domainsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished2367 (5 paraphrase groups)12222Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished2267 (5 paraphrase groups)12284Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished2307 (5 paraphrase groups)12212Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished2437 (5 paraphrase groups)12364Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished2397 (5 paraphrase groups)12309Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished2407 (5 paraphrase groups)12158Open leaderboard

By answer engine

Whole-window rates on each engine

Each link ranks sources with a published Family Software segment by that source's citation rate on one engine across the whole window. It is not a rate inside Family Software alone. A collecting engine has no published ranking for this category.
Cite this
Citation
Machine Relations Index (MRI), Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai. Family Software, observed Machine Relations Index category, 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-02. Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15. https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software. CC BY 4.0.
APA
Parrott, J. (2026). Family Software in the Machine Relations Index (Version mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15) [Data set]. Machine Relations Research. https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423
BibTeX
@misc{parrott2026mrifamilysoftware,
  author = {Parrott, Jaxon},
  title = {Family Software in the Machine Relations Index},
  year = {2026},
  version = {mri\_score\_v2.1+2026-11-02+f9aaeca0db15},
  publisher = {Machine Relations Research},
  url = {https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23652423},
  license = {CC-BY-4.0},
  note = {Machine Relations Index (MRI), Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai}
}

CITATION.cff

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Published November 2, 2026. The observation window runs May 10, 2026 to November 2, 2026. Methodology v2.1.

Use the data
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json" -o machine-relations-index.json
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json" -o mri-release-manifest.json
curl -fsSL "https://huggingface.co/datasets/machine-relations/machine-relations-index/resolve/main/domains.csv" -o domains.csv
curl -fsSL -L "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423" -o mri-zenodo.html
import json
from urllib.request import urlopen

index_url = "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json"
with urlopen(index_url) as response:
    index = json.load(response)
print(index["generated"], index["total_domains"])

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Family Software buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or an identity link for the neutral dataset.