Machine Relations Index

Family Software · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Family Software questions

In the October 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index (mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3), these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 Family Software question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best family software tools. 185 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 201TechRadarEditorial publication37.30%69 of 185
#2 of 201Tom's GuideEditorial publication31.89%59 of 185
#3 of 201Allaboutcookies.orgOther observed source28.11%52 of 185
#4 of 201Safetydetectives.comOther observed source23.78%44 of 185
#5 of 201Impulsec.comOther observed source20.54%38 of 185

Full Best tools leaderboard, 201 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose family software tools. 176 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 248Apple NewsOther observed source17.05%30 of 176
#2 of 248Allaboutcookies.orgOther observed source16.48%29 of 176
#3 of 248Canopy.usOther observed source14.77%26 of 176
#4 of 248RedditCommunity and social platform13.07%23 of 176
#5 of 248TechRadarEditorial publication11.93%21 of 176

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 248 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is family software software worth it. 173 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 197Impulsec.comOther observed source20.81%36 of 173
#2 of 197The New York TimesEditorial publication16.76%29 of 173
#3 of 197Useboomerang.comOther observed source15.61%27 of 173
#4 of 197TechRadarEditorial publication15.03%26 of 173
#5 of 197ForbesEditorial publication13.87%24 of 173

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 197 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve family software problems. 190 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 327Healthychildren.orgOther observed source14.74%28 of 190
#2 of 327RedditCommunity and social platform11.58%22 of 190
#3 of 327Childmind.orgOther observed source10.53%20 of 190
#4 of 327Apple NewsOther observed source8.95%17 of 190
#5 of 327Parentingmentor.comOther observed source8.42%16 of 190

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 327 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top family software platforms. 188 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 282Apple NewsOther observed source30.85%58 of 188
#2 of 282Modakmakers.comOther observed source19.68%37 of 188
#3 of 282Spellingjoy.comOther observed source18.09%34 of 188
#4 of 282RedditCommunity and social platform14.89%28 of 188
#5 of 282Point-up.co.ukOther observed source14.36%27 of 188

Full Top lists leaderboard, 282 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: family software platform A vs B. 189 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 146Useboomerang.comOther observed source26.46%50 of 189
#2 of 146Bark.usOther observed source19.58%37 of 189
#3 of 146Safewise.comOther observed source19.58%37 of 189
#4 of 146PCMagEditorial publication17.99%34 of 189
#5 of 146TechRadarEditorial publication16.93%32 of 189

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 146 sources

Observed shapes6

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published6

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

Release2026-10-16

mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesCited domain observationsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished1857 (5 paraphrase groups)10201Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished1767 (5 paraphrase groups)10248Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished1737 (5 paraphrase groups)10197Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished1907 (5 paraphrase groups)10327Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished1887 (5 paraphrase groups)10282Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished1897 (5 paraphrase groups)10146Open leaderboard

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-10-16; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-16; artifact 676547a595a3.

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Family Software buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.