Machine Relations Index

Consumer Health · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Consumer Health questions

In the October 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index (mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3), these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 Consumer Health question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best consumer health tools. 221 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 406HealthlineEditorial publication41.63%92 of 221
#2 of 406Sleepfoundation.orgAcademic and government source26.70%59 of 221
#3 of 406YouTubeSearch or media platform22.17%49 of 221
#4 of 406Healthcentral.comOther observed source21.72%48 of 221
#5 of 406Yahoo NewsEditorial publication18.55%41 of 221

Full Best tools leaderboard, 406 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose consumer health tools. 219 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 441NIHAcademic and government source23.74%52 of 219
#2 of 441HealthlineEditorial publication18.26%40 of 219
#3 of 441YouTubeSearch or media platform16.44%36 of 219
#4 of 441Herba-medica.siOther observed source12.79%28 of 219
#5 of 441Optibacprobiotics.comOther observed source12.79%28 of 219

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 441 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is consumer health software worth it. 219 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 276NIHAcademic and government source32.42%71 of 219
#2 of 276Uclahealth.orgOther observed source31.96%70 of 219
#3 of 276HealthlineEditorial publication28.31%62 of 219
#4 of 276WebMDEditorial publication26.94%59 of 219
#5 of 276Harvard.eduAcademic and government source26.48%58 of 219

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 276 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve consumer health problems. 220 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 272Clevelandclinic.orgAcademic and government source30.45%67 of 220
#2 of 272Mayoclinic.orgOther observed source28.18%62 of 220
#3 of 272Ubiehealth.comOther observed source22.27%49 of 220
#4 of 272HealthlineEditorial publication21.82%48 of 220
#5 of 272Goodrx.comOther observed source20.00%44 of 220

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 272 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top consumer health platforms. 221 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 467Thefeed.comOther observed source27.15%60 of 221
#2 of 467ForbesEditorial publication24.89%55 of 221
#3 of 467HealthlineEditorial publication19.91%44 of 221
#4 of 467Garage Gym ReviewsOther observed source15.38%34 of 221
#5 of 467Yahoo NewsEditorial publication14.03%31 of 221

Full Top lists leaderboard, 467 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: consumer health platform A vs B. 221 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 266HealthlineEditorial publication28.05%62 of 221
#2 of 266YouTubeSearch or media platform25.34%56 of 221
#3 of 266Cymbiotika.comOther observed source17.65%39 of 221
#4 of 266Nutrisparc.comOther observed source16.74%37 of 221
#5 of 266Medical News TodayEditorial publication15.84%35 of 221

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 266 sources

Observed shapes6

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published6

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

Release2026-10-16

mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesCited domain observationsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished2217 (5 paraphrase groups)10406Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished2197 (5 paraphrase groups)10441Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished2197 (5 paraphrase groups)10276Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished2207 (5 paraphrase groups)10272Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished2217 (5 paraphrase groups)10467Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished2217 (5 paraphrase groups)10266Open leaderboard

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-10-16; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-16; artifact 676547a595a3.

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Consumer Health buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.