Machine Relations Index

Cybersecurity · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Cybersecurity questions

In the October 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index (mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3), these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 7 Cybersecurity question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 7 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best cybersecurity tools. 164 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 284Huntress.comVendor-owned source46.34%76 of 164
#2 of 284Sentinelone.comVendor-owned source25.00%41 of 164
#3 of 284Expertinsights.comMarket and company database23.78%39 of 164
#4 of 284Cynet.comVendor-owned source23.17%38 of 164
#5 of 284Kaseya.comOther observed source22.56%37 of 164

Full Best tools leaderboard, 284 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose cybersecurity tools. 218 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 406Microsoft.comVendor-owned source19.27%42 of 218
#2 of 406Kaseya.comOther observed source12.39%27 of 218
#3 of 406Expel.comOther observed source11.93%26 of 218
#4 of 406RedditCommunity and social platform11.93%26 of 218
#5 of 406Jumpcloud.comOther observed source11.01%24 of 218

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 406 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is cybersecurity software worth it. 219 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 288Paloaltonetworks.comVendor-owned source23.74%52 of 219
#2 of 288Cyware.comOther observed source21.00%46 of 219
#3 of 288Microsoft.comVendor-owned source15.07%33 of 219
#4 of 288Swimlane.comOther observed source13.70%30 of 219
#5 of 288Sentinelone.comVendor-owned source13.24%29 of 219

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 288 sources

News-driven citations

Example pattern: recent cybersecurity news. 599 observed runs across 54 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 1,338Paloaltonetworks.comVendor-owned source13.52%81 of 599
#2 of 1,338Sentinelone.comVendor-owned source12.52%75 of 599
#3 of 1,338Microsoft.comVendor-owned source9.52%57 of 599
#4 of 1,338Gartner.comAnalyst and consulting research9.35%56 of 599
#5 of 1,338Crowdstrike.comVendor-owned source8.51%51 of 599

Full News-driven citations leaderboard, 1,338 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve cybersecurity problems. 205 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 373Github.comCommunity and social platform18.05%37 of 205
#2 of 373Nhimg.orgOther observed source13.17%27 of 205
#3 of 373Microsoft.comVendor-owned source11.71%24 of 205
#4 of 373MediumCommunity and social platform9.76%20 of 205
#5 of 373RedditCommunity and social platform9.76%20 of 205

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 373 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top cybersecurity platforms. 207 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 359Hoxhunt.comOther observed source25.12%52 of 207
#2 of 359Adaptivesecurity.comOther observed source24.64%51 of 207
#3 of 359Expertinsights.comMarket and company database21.74%45 of 207
#4 of 359Usecure.ioOther observed source21.26%44 of 207
#5 of 359Knowbe4.comOther observed source18.84%39 of 207

Full Top lists leaderboard, 359 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: cybersecurity platform A vs B. 159 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 244Vectra.aiVendor-owned source27.67%44 of 159
#2 of 244Exabeam.comOther observed source25.79%41 of 159
#3 of 244Sentinelone.comVendor-owned source23.27%37 of 159
#4 of 244Cynet.comVendor-owned source19.50%31 of 159
#5 of 244Paloaltonetworks.comVendor-owned source17.61%28 of 159

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 244 sources

Observed shapes7

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published7

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

Release2026-10-16

mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesCited domain observationsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished1647 (5 paraphrase groups)10284Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished2187 (5 paraphrase groups)10406Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished2197 (5 paraphrase groups)10288Open leaderboard
News-driven citationsPublished59933541,338Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished2057 (5 paraphrase groups)10373Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished2077 (5 paraphrase groups)10359Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished1597 (5 paraphrase groups)10244Open leaderboard

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-10-16; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-16; artifact 676547a595a3.

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Cybersecurity buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.