Machine Relations Index

Consumer Finance · Machine Relations Index category

Which sources AI engines cite for Consumer Finance questions

In the October 2026 release of the Machine Relations Index (mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3), these are the sources AI answer engines cited most often for each of the 6 Consumer Finance question shapes, each ranked on that shape's own observed runs. This category has 6 observed question-shape segments in the current public release. Each segment keeps its own observed-run denominator and dates; this page does not average rates across shapes. Observed runs are answer runs, not questions: every segment repeats a small set of distinct questions across engines and dates, so a run count is not a count of independent questions.

Top sources by question shape

The sources engines cite most, shape by shape

A rate is the share of the shape's observed answer runs that cited the source; rank is the source's place on that shape's full leaderboard.

Best tools

Example pattern: best consumer finance tools. 220 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 313ForbesEditorial publication35.00%77 of 220
#2 of 313NerdWalletEditorial publication31.82%70 of 220
#3 of 313CNBCEditorial publication29.09%64 of 220
#4 of 313Bankrate.comOther observed source20.45%45 of 220
#5 of 313KiplingerEditorial publication20.00%44 of 220

Full Best tools leaderboard, 313 sources

How buyers choose

Example pattern: how to choose consumer finance tools. 220 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 253Bankrate.comOther observed source26.36%58 of 220
#2 of 253Chase.comOther observed source25.00%55 of 220
#3 of 253NerdWalletEditorial publication19.55%43 of 220
#4 of 253Experian.comVendor-owned source18.18%40 of 220
#5 of 253YouTubeSearch or media platform16.82%37 of 220

Full How buyers choose leaderboard, 253 sources

Is it worth it

Example pattern: is consumer finance software worth it. 220 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 360RedditCommunity and social platform22.27%49 of 220
#2 of 360YouTubeSearch or media platform16.82%37 of 220
#3 of 360NerdWalletEditorial publication14.09%31 of 220
#4 of 360ForbesEditorial publication13.64%30 of 220
#5 of 360Fidelity.comOther observed source11.36%25 of 220

Full Is it worth it leaderboard, 360 sources

Problem-first research

Example pattern: how to solve consumer finance problems. 220 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 297Experian.comVendor-owned source23.64%52 of 220
#2 of 297NerdWalletEditorial publication22.27%49 of 220
#3 of 297YouTubeSearch or media platform21.82%48 of 220
#4 of 297RedditCommunity and social platform12.73%28 of 220
#5 of 297Fidelity.comOther observed source11.82%26 of 220

Full Problem-first research leaderboard, 297 sources

Top lists

Example pattern: top consumer finance platforms. 221 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 310NerdWalletEditorial publication35.29%78 of 221
#2 of 310ForbesEditorial publication27.15%60 of 221
#3 of 310Bankrate.comOther observed source23.98%53 of 221
#4 of 310Experian.comVendor-owned source20.81%46 of 221
#5 of 310The Wall Street JournalEditorial publication20.81%46 of 221

Full Top lists leaderboard, 310 sources

Comparisons

Example pattern: consumer finance platform A vs B. 227 observed runs across 10 dates.

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runs
#1 of 225Acorns.comOther observed source33.04%75 of 227
#2 of 225Unbiased.comVendor-owned source30.84%70 of 227
#3 of 225NerdWalletEditorial publication26.43%60 of 227
#4 of 225YouTubeSearch or media platform25.11%57 of 227
#5 of 225RedditCommunity and social platform24.67%56 of 227

Full Comparisons leaderboard, 225 sources

Observed shapes6

Canonical segment URLs exist only for observed category/shape pairs.

Published6

Published segments met the release evidence floor.

Collecting0

Collecting segments expose sample progress, not mature leaderboards.

Release2026-10-16

mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3

Question shapes

Separate denominators by segment

Question shapeStateObserved runsDistinct questionsRun datesCited domain observationsCanonical segment
Best toolsPublished2207 (5 paraphrase groups)10313Open leaderboard
How buyers choosePublished2207 (5 paraphrase groups)10253Open leaderboard
Is it worth itPublished2207 (5 paraphrase groups)10360Open leaderboard
Problem-first researchPublished2207 (5 paraphrase groups)10297Open leaderboard
Top listsPublished2217 (5 paraphrase groups)10310Open leaderboard
ComparisonsPublished2277 (5 paraphrase groups)10225Open leaderboard

Release and boundary

No pooled category score

Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-16+676547a595a3; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-10-16; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-16; artifact 676547a595a3.

This page is a directory of observed segments. A domain's overall citation rate is not a category rate, and MRI does not publish an averaged category score in this slice.

Consumer Finance buyers on AuthorityTech’s publication intelligence is a downstream practitioner projection of these segments. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.