203 cited runs of 15,782 observed answer runs.
Machine Relations IndexCitation rate1.29% Days observed52/125 Engine breadth4 ConfidenceConfidence B
Source domain profile · Community and social platform
Facebook.com in the Machine Relations Index
facebook.com appeared as a cited source in 203 of 15,782 monitored answer runs (1.29%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18.
Days cited and days observed in the current release window.
gemini, google_ai_mode, google_ai_overviews, perplexity. This is an observed-engine list, not a per-engine rate.
MRI confidence is not an Answer-Source Fidelity grade.
Standing
Population ranks from the public release
- Public standing
- #23 of 22,179 observed domains
- Full universe
- #23 of 22,179
- Source role population
- #5 of 27
- Evidence-qualified source role
- #5 of 10
Segment evidence
Observed category and question-shape rows
Segment rates use the exact category/question-shape denominator. Collecting rows show sample progress only; null or missing rates are not rendered as 0%.
| Category | Question shape | State | Cited runs | Observed runs | Run dates | Rate | Confidence | Rank population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Infrastructure | Best tools | Published | 2 | 77 | 7 | 2.60% | Unavailable | #84 of 204 |
| AI Infrastructure | How buyers choose | Published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #163 of 258 |
| AI Infrastructure | Problem-first research | Published | 2 | 106 | 7 | 1.89% | Unavailable | #64 of 212 |
| AI Infrastructure | Top lists | Published | 1 | 108 | 7 | 0.93% | Unavailable | #179 of 270 |
| AI Infrastructure | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 108 | 7 | 0.93% | Unavailable | #145 of 231 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Problem-first research | Published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #155 of 272 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Top lists | Published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #204 of 313 |
| AI Security & Privacy | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 114 | 7 | 0.88% | Unavailable | #175 of 263 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | How buyers choose | Published | 2 | 113 | 7 | 1.77% | Unavailable | #102 of 448 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Is it worth it | Published | 1 | 137 | 7 | 0.73% | Unavailable | #291 of 467 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Problem-first research | Published | 7 | 132 | 7 | 5.30% | Unavailable | #11 of 420 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Top lists | Published | 1 | 71 | 7 | 1.41% | Unavailable | #221 of 412 |
| AI Visibility & GEO | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 132 | 7 | 0.76% | Unavailable | #240 of 417 |
| Consumer Finance | Best tools | Published | 1 | 132 | 7 | 0.76% | Unavailable | #160 of 236 |
| Consumer Finance | How buyers choose | Published | 7 | 132 | 7 | 5.30% | Unavailable | #29 of 191 |
| Consumer Finance | Is it worth it | Published | 6 | 132 | 7 | 4.55% | Unavailable | #32 of 262 |
| Consumer Finance | Problem-first research | Published | 3 | 132 | 7 | 2.27% | Unavailable | #63 of 226 |
| Consumer Finance | Top lists | Published | 6 | 132 | 7 | 4.55% | Unavailable | #45 of 233 |
| Consumer Finance | Comparisons | Published | 7 | 138 | 7 | 5.07% | Unavailable | #29 of 170 |
| Consumer Health | How buyers choose | Published | 3 | 131 | 7 | 2.29% | Unavailable | #82 of 339 |
| Consumer Health | Is it worth it | Published | 10 | 130 | 7 | 7.69% | Unavailable | #19 of 213 |
| Consumer Health | Problem-first research | Published | 3 | 131 | 7 | 2.29% | Unavailable | #63 of 227 |
| Consumer Health | Top lists | Published | 7 | 131 | 7 | 5.34% | Unavailable | #39 of 338 |
| Consumer Health | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 131 | 7 | 0.76% | Unavailable | #131 of 217 |
| Consumer Products | Best tools | Published | 6 | 131 | 7 | 4.58% | Unavailable | #37 of 318 |
| Consumer Products | How buyers choose | Published | 3 | 137 | 7 | 2.19% | Unavailable | #90 of 427 |
| Consumer Products | Is it worth it | Published | 15 | 136 | 7 | 11.03% | Unavailable | #11 of 228 |
| Consumer Products | Problem-first research | Published | 10 | 132 | 7 | 7.58% | Unavailable | #16 of 216 |
| Consumer Products | Top lists | Published | 8 | 131 | 7 | 6.11% | Unavailable | #26 of 380 |
| Consumer Products | Comparisons | Published | 6 | 131 | 7 | 4.58% | Unavailable | #41 of 268 |
| Cybersecurity | News-driven citations | Published | 4 | 623 | 54 | 0.64% | Unavailable | #270 of 1,340 |
| Cybersecurity | Problem-first research | Published | 2 | 125 | 7 | 1.60% | Unavailable | #100 of 263 |
| Cybersecurity | Top lists | Published | 1 | 130 | 7 | 0.77% | Unavailable | #195 of 264 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Best tools | Published | 2 | 121 | 7 | 1.65% | Unavailable | #127 of 328 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | How buyers choose | Published | 2 | 130 | 7 | 1.54% | Unavailable | #79 of 195 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Is it worth it | Published | 1 | 105 | 7 | 0.95% | Unavailable | #115 of 181 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Problem-first research | Published | 2 | 104 | 7 | 1.92% | Unavailable | #54 of 157 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Top lists | Published | 4 | 106 | 7 | 3.77% | Unavailable | #56 of 279 |
| Deep Tech & Hardware | Comparisons | Published | 1 | 105 | 7 | 0.95% | Unavailable | #120 of 171 |
| Education & Training | Best tools | Published | 2 | 106 | 7 | 1.89% | Unavailable | #105 of 263 |
| Education & Training | How buyers choose | Published | 3 | 130 | 7 | 2.31% | Unavailable | #75 of 249 |
| Education & Training | Is it worth it | Published | 1 | 100 | 7 | 1.00% | Unavailable | #143 of 201 |
| Education & Training | Problem-first research | Published | 2 | 100 | 7 | 2.00% | Unavailable | #62 of 229 |
| Education & Training | Top lists | Published | 1 | 100 | 7 | 1.00% | Unavailable | #192 of 295 |
| Education & Training | Comparisons | Published | 4 | 100 | 7 | 4.00% | Unavailable | #40 of 126 |
| Emergent Prosumer | Best tools | Published | 1 | 100 | 7 | 1.00% | Unavailable | #152 of 219 |
| Emergent Prosumer | How buyers choose | Published | 2 | 100 | 7 | 2.00% | Unavailable | #96 of 192 |
| Emergent Prosumer | Problem-first research | Published | 2 | 101 | 7 | 1.98% | Unavailable | #66 of 162 |
| Emergent Prosumer | Top lists | Published | 4 | 101 | 7 | 3.96% | Unavailable | #41 of 211 |
| Emergent Prosumer | Comparisons | Published | 5 | 95 | 7 | 5.26% | Unavailable | #26 of 118 |
| Family Software | Comparisons | Published | 2 | 108 | 7 | 1.85% | Unavailable | #60 of 101 |
| Fintech | News-driven citations | Published | 2 | 616 | 53 | 0.32% | Unavailable | #506 of 1,531 |
| Healthcare Services | News-driven citations | Published | 4 | 613 | 53 | 0.65% | Unavailable | #250 of 1,264 |
| HR & Talent | News-driven citations | Published | 3 | 608 | 53 | 0.49% | Unavailable | #332 of 1,249 |
| Legacy News Topics | News-driven citations | Published | 22 | 2,138 | 54 | 1.03% | Unavailable | #119 of 4,025 |
Published segments: 55. Collecting segments: 0.
Release and boundary
How to cite this profile
Facebook.com (facebook.com), 1.29% citation rate, 203 of 15,782 monitored answer runs, 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18, mri_score_v2.0, mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a, https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/facebook.com.
Release mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a; methodology mri_score_v2.0; generated 2026-09-18; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18; artifact 8fa38e54dd0a.
The public dataset reports citation rates, rankings, and evidence counts. It excludes internal query identifiers, raw cited URLs, and answer-engine provider payloads. MRI measures observed root-domain citations in monitored prompts, not all AI answers, recommendation quality, web traffic or commercial performance. A citation is not source support.
AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection is a downstream practitioner projection. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.