Google AI Mode

Google AI Mode · iGaming & Betting · Machine Relations Index

Which sources does Google AI Mode cite most among iGaming & Betting sources?

As of October 25, 2026, among sources with a published iGaming & Betting segment, LinkedIn is the most-cited source in Google AI Mode answers across the whole window, cited in 24.59% of 1,895 observed Google AI Mode runs.

A rate is the source's share of Google AI Mode's observed runs across the whole window, not a rate inside iGaming & Betting. The public release does not record a separate rate for one engine inside one category. Sources are listed only when they have a published segment here, which means that segment cleared the evidence floor.

Ranking

Sources ranked by citation rate

RankSourceSource roleCitation rateCited runsEngine's observed runsConfidence
#1 of 162LinkedInCommunity and social platform24.59%4661,895A
#2 of 162RedditCommunity and social platform17.15%3251,895A
#3 of 162YouTubeSearch or media platform12.98%2461,895A
#4 of 162Gartner.comAnalyst and consulting research7.23%1371,895A
#5 of 162Yahoo NewsEditorial publication6.70%1271,895A
#6 of 162G2Market and company database4.54%861,895A
#7 of 162Substack.comCommunity and social platform3.91%741,895A
#8 of 162NIHAcademic and government source3.38%641,895A
#9 of 162Facebook.comCommunity and social platform3.01%571,895B
#10 of 162Fortunebusinessinsights.comMarket and company database2.69%511,895B
#11 of 162Paloaltonetworks.comVendor-owned source2.11%401,895A
#12 of 162PR NewswireWire and press-release distribution1.95%371,895B
#13 of 162TechTargetEditorial publication1.90%361,895A
#14 of 162Amazon.comOther observed source1.69%321,895A
#14 of 162Tech InsiderEditorial publication1.69%321,895B
#16 of 162NerdWalletEditorial publication1.48%281,895A
#17 of 162Dev.toCommunity and social platform1.32%251,895A
#18 of 162Business InsiderEditorial publication1.27%241,895B
#19 of 162Arxiv.orgAcademic and government source1.16%221,895A
#19 of 162Ey.comAnalyst and consulting research1.16%221,895C
#21 of 162Mdpi.comOther observed source1.00%191,895B
#22 of 162Cometly.comVendor-owned source0.90%171,895C
#22 of 162Harvard.eduAcademic and government source0.90%171,895B
#24 of 162Cision.comVendor-owned source0.84%161,895C
#24 of 162Investopedia.comOther observed source0.84%161,895B
#24 of 162The New York TimesEditorial publication0.84%161,895B
#27 of 162Business WireWire and press-release distribution0.69%131,895B
#28 of 162Github.comCommunity and social platform0.63%121,895A
#28 of 162Researchandmarkets.comMarket and company database0.63%121,895C
#28 of 162VocalOther observed source0.63%121,895C
#31 of 162ReutersEditorial publication0.58%111,895Collecting
#32 of 162CBS NewsEditorial publication0.53%101,895C
#32 of 162Cloudwars.comOther observed source0.53%101,895Collecting
#32 of 162Financialcontent.comWire and press-release distribution0.53%101,895C
#32 of 162Nhimg.orgOther observed source0.53%101,895B
#32 of 162Northflank.comVendor-owned source0.53%101,895C
#32 of 162SourceForgeMarket and company database0.53%101,895C
#32 of 162Springer.comOther observed source0.53%101,895C
#32 of 162WikipediaAcademic and government source0.53%101,895A
#40 of 162Capterra.comMarket and company database0.47%91,895B
#40 of 162Cloudflare.comOther observed source0.47%91,895C
#40 of 162Improvado.ioVendor-owned source0.47%91,895B
#40 of 162Infosecurity MagazineEditorial publication0.47%91,895C
#40 of 162Lexisnexis.comAcademic and government source0.47%91,895Collecting
#45 of 162Investing.comEditorial publication0.37%71,895C
#45 of 162Lattice.comVendor-owned source0.37%71,895C
#45 of 162Meegle.comOther observed source0.37%71,895Collecting
#48 of 162Fticonsulting.comAnalyst and consulting research0.32%61,895Collecting
#48 of 162Saasworthy.comOther observed source0.32%61,895C
#48 of 162The Financial BrandEditorial publication0.32%61,895Collecting
#51 of 162Biz4group.comAnalyst and consulting research0.26%51,895Collecting
#51 of 162The National Law ReviewEditorial publication0.26%51,895Collecting
#51 of 162Sphericalinsights.comAnalyst and consulting research0.26%51,895Collecting
#51 of 162Track360.ioOther observed source0.26%51,895B
#51 of 162X.comCommunity and social platform0.26%51,895C
#56 of 1625wpr.comOther observed source0.21%41,895Collecting
#56 of 162Apple News (Syndication from Grit Daily)Other observed source0.21%41,895B
#56 of 162Bloomreach.comVendor-owned source0.21%41,895C
#56 of 162Cisa.govAcademic and government source0.21%41,895Collecting
#56 of 162CNETEditorial publication0.21%41,895B
#56 of 162Europa.euAcademic and government source0.21%41,895C
#56 of 162Intellias.comOther observed source0.21%41,895Collecting
#56 of 162Kaspersky.comOther observed source0.21%41,895Collecting
#56 of 162The Silicon ReviewOther observed source0.21%41,895Collecting
#56 of 162Tigsoftwares.comOther observed source0.21%41,895C
#56 of 162USA TodayEditorial publication0.21%41,895C
#67 of 162Amplitude.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Clevertap.comOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Corefy.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Dataintelo.comAnalyst and consulting research0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Finix.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Geocomply.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162GlobeNewswireWire and press-release distribution0.16%31,895B
#67 of 162Innowise.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Locance.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Radar.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Reform.appOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Securitybrief.com.auOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Shopify.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Solidgate.comVendor-owned source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Symphony-solutions.comOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Tandfonline.comOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Tech TimesEditorial publication0.16%31,895C
#67 of 162Tencentcloud.comOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Ventureburn.comOther observed source0.16%31,895Collecting
#67 of 162Y.unoOther observed source0.16%31,895C
#87 of 162Avenga.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162BloombergEditorial publication0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Chargeflow.ioOther observed source0.11%21,895C
#87 of 162Chime.comOther observed source0.11%21,895C
#87 of 162Daeryunlaw.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Igpgaming.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Law360Editorial publication0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Pestel-analysis.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Pnc.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Rapyd.netOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Sardine.aiOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Sec.govAcademic and government source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Sportsgamblingpodcast.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting
#87 of 162Statsig.comOther observed source0.11%21,895Collecting

Showing the first 100 of 162 ranked sources.

Category leaderboard, pooled across engines: iGaming & Betting

Method

What each engine's figures measure

Published October 25, 2026. The observation window runs May 10, 2026 to October 25, 2026. Methodology v2.1.

The release roster names no model for Google AI Mode.

Google AI Mode's sample is 1,895 observed runs across 119 dates. The evidence floor is 10 observed runs and 7 distinct dates.

ChatGPT runs. They go through OpenAI's API with web search switched on, using the model each release names in its engine roster: GPT-4.1 mini in current releases, while earlier runs in the window were answered by an earlier GPT-4o mini search preview. That is the retrieval layer apps and research agents built on OpenAI's API use. The signed-in ChatGPT app answers with its own models and search pipeline and cites differently: a preprint submitted on 2026-10-11 and not yet peer reviewed found that Google Search and OpenAI's API on comparable models together recovered about half of the hostnames ChatGPT Web cited (48.7 and 50.3 percent on two model settings) and 26 to 28 percent of its exact URLs (arXiv 2610.15382v1). Claude, Gemini and Perplexity runs are likewise API runs with web search, on the models the roster names.

Method note, 2026-09-25. From that date, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews runs come through a different collection path than earlier runs, with no overlapping days, and answers collected on the two paths differ in how many distinct domains each cites. Per-answer figures for those two engines are read within one side of 2026-09-25, not as a trend across it.

Degraded coverage: 5 of 6 answer engines are currently returning citation-bearing answers. Gemini is quiet (5 of 20 collected calls produced an observation, 25%). Coverage across the window is uneven: Gemini returned citation-bearing answers on 140 of 162 observed days (2,197 of 6,962 returned runs produced a citation); Google AI Mode returned citation-bearing answers on 119 of 162 observed days (1,613 of 2,086 returned runs produced a citation); Google AI Overviews returned citation-bearing answers on 102 of 162 observed days (963 of 1,446 returned runs produced a citation). Engines below 90% of the window are named here; per-engine day and run counts for all 6 are in engine_roster.

Cite this
Citation
Machine Relations Index (MRI) by Jaxon Parrott, Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai. As of October 25, 2026, among sources with a published iGaming & Betting segment, LinkedIn is the most-cited source in Google AI Mode answers across the whole window, cited in 24.59% of 1,895 observed Google AI Mode runs. Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-25+9c34b2dccc04. https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/google_ai_mode/igaming-betting. CC BY 4.0.
APA
Parrott, J. (2026). Which sources does Google AI Mode cite most among iGaming & Betting sources? (Version mri_score_v2.1+2026-10-25+9c34b2dccc04) [Data set]. Machine Relations Research. https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/google_ai_mode/igaming-betting
BibTeX
@misc{parrott2026mrigoogleaimodeigamingbetting,
  author = {Parrott, Jaxon},
  title = {Which sources does Google AI Mode cite most among iGaming \& Betting sources?},
  year = {2026},
  version = {mri\_score\_v2.1+2026-10-25+9c34b2dccc04},
  publisher = {Machine Relations Research},
  url = {https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/google_ai_mode/igaming-betting},
  license = {CC-BY-4.0},
  note = {Machine Relations Index (MRI) by Jaxon Parrott, Machine Relations Research — machinerelations.ai}
}

CITATION.cff