---
title: "redteamlog.com in the Machine Relations Index"
description: "redteamlog.com appeared as a cited source in 2 of 39,811 monitored answer runs (under 0.01%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-15."
canonical: "https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com"
---

# redteamlog.com in the Machine Relations Index

redteamlog.com appeared as a cited source in 2 of 39,811 monitored answer runs (under 0.01%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-15.

Canonical URL: https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com
Canonical domain: redteamlog.com
Source role: Editorial publication
Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-15+49589518c9ac; methodology mri_score_v2.1; generated 2026-11-15; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-15; artifact 2b087b5b13e5.

## How the Site Describes Itself

> RedTeam Log: Bits, bytes and breaking security news. Breaking cybersecurity and technology news.

redteamlog.com describes itself this way in the description tag on its homepage, read on November 15, 2026. It is the source's own wording, quoted as found, not a finding of this Index.

## Overall Evidence

- Citation rate: under 0.01%
- Cited runs: 2 of 39,811
- Days cited: 2 of 183
- Engine breadth: 1 observed engine (claude)
- Confidence: Collecting
- Standing: Collecting: no rank until it clears the evidence floor

## Observed Segments

| Category | Question shape | State | Cited runs | Observed runs | Run dates | Rate | Standing |
|---|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/is_x_worth) | published | 2 | 324 | 14 | 0.62% | #179 of 353 |

## Citation History

redteamlog.com was first cited in a monitored answer run on October 28, 2026, and most recently on November 15, 2026, with cited runs in each of the 2 months from then to this release. The release window opens 2026-05-10, so an earlier citation would not show here.

A month's rate is the share of all monitored answer runs that month that cited this domain. The latest month is still collecting.

| Month | Cited runs | Observed runs | Rate |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| October 2026 | 1 | 16,496 | 0.01% |
| November 2026 (to 2026-11-15) | 1 | 5,328 | 0.02% |

## By Answer Engine

An engine's rate is its cited runs over every monitored run that engine answered in the window. Engines answer different numbers of runs, so compare rates, not counts.

| Engine | Cited runs | Engine's observed runs | Rate |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| [Claude](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/claude) | 2 | 9,450 | 0.02% |
| [ChatGPT](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/chatgpt) | 0 | 9,501 | 0.00% |
| [Gemini](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/gemini) | 0 | 7,608 | 0.00% |
| [Google AI Mode](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/google_ai_mode) | 0 | 2,249 | 0.00% |
| [Google AI Overviews](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/google_ai_overviews) | 0 | 1,382 | 0.00% |
| [Perplexity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/engines/perplexity) | 0 | 9,621 | 0.00% |

Since August 31, 2026, redteamlog.com is cited in none of 1,043 observed Google AI Mode runs. Google AI Mode's collection changed between August 10, 2026 and August 30, 2026, so its row above pools both sides of the change.

Since October 7, 2026, redteamlog.com is cited in none of 4,852 observed Perplexity runs. Perplexity's collection changed between October 6, 2026 and October 7, 2026, so its row above pools both sides of the change.

## Peers

redteamlog.com holds its best segment rank, #179 of 353, in Cybersecurity / Is it worth it, at 0.62%. 46 sources on that leaderboard share that rate, and their order inside the tie is not a measured difference. Listed here: the nearest sources cited more and less often than it, and the sources beside it that share this best segment. Leaderboard: https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/is_x_worth

| Rank | Source | Source role | Segment citation rate | Against this source |
|---|---|---|---:|---|
| #136 of 353 | [lookout.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/lookout.com) | Other observed source | 0.93% | +0.31 pts |
| #137 of 353 | [manageengine.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/manageengine.com) | Other observed source | 0.93% | +0.31 pts |
| #138 of 353 | [marketintelo.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/marketintelo.com) | Analyst and consulting research | 0.93% | +0.31 pts |
| #178 of 353 | [photonsecurity.in](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/photonsecurity.in) | Other observed source | 0.62% | Same rate |
| #180 of 353 | [safebreach.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/safebreach.com) | Other observed source | 0.62% | Same rate |
| #292 of 353 | [paloaltonetworks.co.uk](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/paloaltonetworks.co.uk) | Other observed source | 0.31% | -0.31 pts |
| #293 of 353 | [patentpc.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/patentpc.com) | Other observed source | 0.31% | -0.31 pts |
| #294 of 353 | [peerspot.com](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/peerspot.com) | Market and company database | 0.31% | -0.31 pts |

## Citation

Machine Relations Index, Jaxon Parrott — machinerelations.ai. redteamlog.com, under 0.01% citation rate, 2 of 39,811 monitored answer runs, 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-15. Release mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-15+49589518c9ac. CC BY 4.0. https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com

APA

Parrott, J. (2026). redteamlog.com in the Machine Relations Index (Version mri_score_v2.1+2026-11-15+49589518c9ac) [Data set]. Machine Relations Research. https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423

BibTeX

```bibtex
@misc{parrott2026mriredteamlogcom,
  author = {Parrott, Jaxon},
  title = {redteamlog.com in the Machine Relations Index},
  year = {2026},
  version = {mri\_score\_v2.1+2026-11-15+49589518c9ac},
  publisher = {Machine Relations Research},
  url = {https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23652423},
  license = {CC-BY-4.0},
  note = {Machine Relations Index, Jaxon Parrott — machinerelations.ai}
}
```

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423

Citation file: https://machinerelations.ai/CITATION.cff

## Badge

Badge image: https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com/badge.svg

[![redteamlog.com in the Machine Relations Index: cited in under 0.01% of monitored AI answers (2 of 39,811 runs), Nov 15, 2026 release. Machine Relations Index, Jaxon Parrott — machinerelations.ai.](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com/badge.svg)](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/redteamlog.com)

Put this badge on your site to show how often AI answers cite it. It links to this profile and updates with every new release; if a later release no longer includes this domain, the badge stops loading. To keep today's numbers fixed, save the SVG and host it yourself.

## Use the data

The public JSON is https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json. The release manifest is https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json. The domain CSV is https://huggingface.co/datasets/machine-relations/machine-relations-index/resolve/main/domains.csv. The Zenodo concept DOI is https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423.

```bash
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json" -o machine-relations-index.json
curl -fsSL "https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json" -o mri-release-manifest.json
curl -fsSL "https://huggingface.co/datasets/machine-relations/machine-relations-index/resolve/main/domains.csv" -o domains.csv
curl -fsSL -L "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23652423" -o mri-zenodo.html
```

```python
import json
from urllib.request import urlopen

index_url = "https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json"
with urlopen(index_url) as response:
    index = json.load(response)
print(index["generated"], index["total_domains"])
```

## Public Boundary

The public dataset reports citation rates, rankings, and evidence counts. It excludes internal query identifiers, raw cited URLs, and answer-engine provider payloads. MRI measures observed root-domain citations in monitored prompts; it does not measure all AI answers, recommendation quality, website traffic, or commercial performance. A citation does not prove source support, and MRI confidence is not an Answer-Source Fidelity grade.

## Related Sources

- [Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/index)
- [Public JSON artifact](https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json)
- [Release manifest](https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json)
- [redteamlog.com on AuthorityTech's publication intelligence](https://authoritytech.io/publications/redteamlog) — part of the AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection. Practitioner projection derived from the neutral Machine Relations Index. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.
- [AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection](https://authoritytech.io/publications.md) — Practitioner projection derived from the neutral Machine Relations Index. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.