# Reddit in the Machine Relations Index

Canonical URL: https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/reddit.com
Canonical domain: reddit.com
Source role: Community and social platform
Release mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a; methodology mri_score_v2.0; generated 2026-09-18; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18; artifact 8fa38e54dd0a.

reddit.com appeared as a cited source in 2,012 of 15,782 monitored answer runs (12.75%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18.

## Overall Evidence

- Citation rate: 12.75%
- Cited runs: 2,012 of 15,782
- Days cited: 120 of 125
- Engine breadth: 4 observed engines (gemini, google_ai_mode, google_ai_overviews, perplexity)
- Confidence: Confidence A
- Standing: #1 of 22,179 observed domains

## Observed Segments

| Category | Question shape | State | Cited runs | Observed runs | Run dates | Rate | Confidence | Standing |
|---|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/best_x) | published | 20 | 77 | 7 | 25.97% | Unavailable | #3 of 204 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/how_choose) | published | 17 | 106 | 7 | 16.04% | Unavailable | #5 of 258 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/is_x_worth) | published | 34 | 106 | 7 | 32.08% | Unavailable | #1 of 265 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/problem_first) | published | 23 | 106 | 7 | 21.70% | Unavailable | #1 of 212 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/top_list) | published | 26 | 108 | 7 | 24.07% | Unavailable | #4 of 270 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/x_vs_y) | published | 17 | 108 | 7 | 15.74% | Unavailable | #6 of 231 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/best_x) | published | 23 | 136 | 7 | 16.91% | Unavailable | #7 of 275 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/how_choose) | published | 12 | 130 | 7 | 9.23% | Unavailable | #16 of 305 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/is_x_worth) | published | 16 | 130 | 7 | 12.31% | Unavailable | #7 of 330 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/problem_first) | published | 16 | 106 | 7 | 15.09% | Unavailable | #4 of 272 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/top_list) | published | 17 | 106 | 7 | 16.04% | Unavailable | #9 of 313 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/x_vs_y) | published | 4 | 114 | 7 | 3.51% | Unavailable | #48 of 263 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/best_x) | published | 29 | 113 | 7 | 25.66% | Unavailable | #2 of 351 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/how_choose) | published | 11 | 113 | 7 | 9.73% | Unavailable | #9 of 448 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/is_x_worth) | published | 38 | 137 | 7 | 27.74% | Unavailable | #1 of 467 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/problem_first) | published | 37 | 132 | 7 | 28.03% | Unavailable | #2 of 420 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/top_list) | published | 9 | 71 | 7 | 12.68% | Unavailable | #6 of 412 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/x_vs_y) | published | 30 | 132 | 7 | 22.73% | Unavailable | #2 of 417 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/best_x) | published | 33 | 132 | 7 | 25.00% | Unavailable | #5 of 236 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/how_choose) | published | 26 | 132 | 7 | 19.70% | Unavailable | #6 of 191 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/is_x_worth) | published | 42 | 132 | 7 | 31.82% | Unavailable | #1 of 262 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/problem_first) | published | 25 | 132 | 7 | 18.94% | Unavailable | #4 of 226 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/top_list) | published | 37 | 132 | 7 | 28.03% | Unavailable | #3 of 233 |
| [Consumer Finance](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-finance/x_vs_y) | published | 43 | 138 | 7 | 31.16% | Unavailable | #3 of 170 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/best_x) | published | 14 | 132 | 7 | 10.61% | Unavailable | #15 of 298 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/how_choose) | published | 16 | 131 | 7 | 12.21% | Unavailable | #10 of 339 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/is_x_worth) | published | 19 | 130 | 7 | 14.62% | Unavailable | #9 of 213 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/problem_first) | published | 20 | 131 | 7 | 15.27% | Unavailable | #10 of 227 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/top_list) | published | 22 | 131 | 7 | 16.79% | Unavailable | #5 of 338 |
| [Consumer Health](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-health/x_vs_y) | published | 23 | 131 | 7 | 17.56% | Unavailable | #7 of 217 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/best_x) | published | 33 | 131 | 7 | 25.19% | Unavailable | #3 of 318 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/how_choose) | published | 32 | 137 | 7 | 23.36% | Unavailable | #2 of 427 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/is_x_worth) | published | 38 | 136 | 7 | 27.94% | Unavailable | #1 of 228 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/problem_first) | published | 29 | 132 | 7 | 21.97% | Unavailable | #1 of 216 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/top_list) | published | 17 | 131 | 7 | 12.98% | Unavailable | #12 of 380 |
| [Consumer Products](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/consumer-products/x_vs_y) | published | 30 | 131 | 7 | 22.90% | Unavailable | #3 of 268 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/best_x) | published | 15 | 75 | 7 | 20.00% | Unavailable | #8 of 213 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/how_choose) | published | 24 | 131 | 7 | 18.32% | Unavailable | #2 of 325 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/is_x_worth) | published | 25 | 131 | 7 | 19.08% | Unavailable | #3 of 227 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/news_topic) | published | 37 | 623 | 54 | 5.94% | Unavailable | #10 of 1,340 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/problem_first) | published | 20 | 125 | 7 | 16.00% | Unavailable | #2 of 263 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/top_list) | published | 33 | 130 | 7 | 25.38% | Unavailable | #4 of 264 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/x_vs_y) | published | 18 | 107 | 7 | 16.82% | Unavailable | #6 of 189 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/best_x) | published | 25 | 121 | 7 | 20.66% | Unavailable | #1 of 328 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/how_choose) | published | 32 | 130 | 7 | 24.62% | Unavailable | #2 of 195 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/is_x_worth) | published | 15 | 105 | 7 | 14.29% | Unavailable | #6 of 181 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/problem_first) | published | 18 | 104 | 7 | 17.31% | Unavailable | #2 of 157 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/top_list) | published | 16 | 106 | 7 | 15.09% | Unavailable | #3 of 279 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/x_vs_y) | published | 24 | 105 | 7 | 22.86% | Unavailable | #1 of 171 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/best_x) | published | 36 | 106 | 7 | 33.96% | Unavailable | #1 of 263 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/how_choose) | published | 23 | 130 | 7 | 17.69% | Unavailable | #1 of 249 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/is_x_worth) | published | 23 | 100 | 7 | 23.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 201 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/problem_first) | published | 13 | 100 | 7 | 13.00% | Unavailable | #2 of 229 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/top_list) | published | 19 | 100 | 7 | 19.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 295 |
| [Education & Training](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/education-training/x_vs_y) | published | 25 | 100 | 7 | 25.00% | Unavailable | #2 of 126 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/best_x) | published | 21 | 100 | 7 | 21.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 219 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/how_choose) | published | 21 | 100 | 7 | 21.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 192 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/is_x_worth) | published | 25 | 100 | 7 | 25.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 136 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/problem_first) | published | 23 | 101 | 7 | 22.77% | Unavailable | #1 of 162 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/top_list) | published | 20 | 101 | 7 | 19.80% | Unavailable | #2 of 211 |
| [Emergent Prosumer](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/emergent-prosumer/x_vs_y) | published | 19 | 95 | 7 | 20.00% | Unavailable | #3 of 118 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/best_x) | published | 3 | 101 | 7 | 2.97% | Unavailable | #75 of 167 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/how_choose) | published | 5 | 99 | 7 | 5.05% | Unavailable | #25 of 172 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/is_x_worth) | published | 5 | 107 | 7 | 4.67% | Unavailable | #31 of 194 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/news_topic) | published | 47 | 596 | 53 | 7.89% | Unavailable | #5 of 1,375 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/problem_first) | published | 14 | 106 | 7 | 13.21% | Unavailable | #1 of 258 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/top_list) | published | 2 | 114 | 7 | 1.75% | Unavailable | #124 of 264 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/x_vs_y) | published | 7 | 114 | 7 | 6.14% | Unavailable | #22 of 186 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/best_x) | published | 25 | 114 | 7 | 21.93% | Unavailable | #5 of 118 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/how_choose) | published | 18 | 104 | 7 | 17.31% | Unavailable | #2 of 153 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/is_x_worth) | published | 21 | 100 | 7 | 21.00% | Unavailable | #1 of 114 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/problem_first) | published | 21 | 108 | 7 | 19.44% | Unavailable | #1 of 195 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/top_list) | published | 25 | 108 | 7 | 23.15% | Unavailable | #2 of 195 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/x_vs_y) | published | 21 | 108 | 7 | 19.44% | Unavailable | #3 of 101 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/best_x) | published | 9 | 108 | 7 | 8.33% | Unavailable | #21 of 224 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/how_choose) | published | 1 | 102 | 7 | 0.98% | Unavailable | #153 of 170 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/is_x_worth) | published | 2 | 108 | 7 | 1.85% | Unavailable | #92 of 206 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/news_topic) | published | 22 | 616 | 53 | 3.57% | Unavailable | #27 of 1,531 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/top_list) | published | 9 | 102 | 7 | 8.82% | Unavailable | #15 of 200 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/x_vs_y) | published | 3 | 102 | 7 | 2.94% | Unavailable | #65 of 136 |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/best_x) | collecting | 4 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/how_choose) | collecting | 4 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/is_x_worth) | collecting | 9 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/news_topic) | published | 18 | 613 | 53 | 2.94% | Unavailable | #34 of 1,264 |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/problem_first) | collecting | 1 | 102 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/top_list) | collecting | 2 | 78 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/x_vs_y) | collecting | 4 | 72 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/best_x) | collecting | 9 | 72 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/how_choose) | collecting | 7 | 71 | 5 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/is_x_worth) | collecting | 2 | 66 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/news_topic) | published | 28 | 608 | 53 | 4.61% | Unavailable | #21 of 1,249 |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/problem_first) | collecting | 6 | 65 | 4 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/x_vs_y) | collecting | 4 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [iGaming & Betting](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting/best_x) | collecting | 3 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [iGaming & Betting](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting/is_x_worth) | collecting | 2 | 35 | 2 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [iGaming & Betting](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/igaming-betting/problem_first) | collecting | 4 | 30 | 1 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Legacy News Topics](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/legacy-unmapped) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/legacy-unmapped/news_topic) | published | 161 | 2,138 | 54 | 7.53% | Unavailable | #5 of 4,025 |
| [Martech & Advertising](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/martech-advertising) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/martech-advertising/news_topic) | published | 36 | 602 | 53 | 5.98% | Unavailable | #16 of 1,244 |

## Citation

Reddit (reddit.com), 12.75% citation rate, 2,012 of 15,782 monitored answer runs, 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18, mri_score_v2.0, mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a, https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/reddit.com.

## Public Boundary

The public dataset reports citation rates, rankings, and evidence counts. It excludes internal query identifiers, raw cited URLs, and answer-engine provider payloads. MRI measures observed root-domain citations in monitored prompts; it does not measure all AI answers, recommendation quality, website traffic, or commercial performance. A citation does not prove source support, and MRI confidence is not an Answer-Source Fidelity grade.

## Related Sources

- [Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/index)
- [Public JSON artifact](https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json)
- [Release manifest](https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json)
- [AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection](https://authoritytech.io/publications.md) — Practitioner projection derived from the neutral Machine Relations Index. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.