# Arxiv.org in the Machine Relations Index

Canonical URL: https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/arxiv.org
Canonical domain: arxiv.org
Source role: Academic and government source
Release mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a; methodology mri_score_v2.0; generated 2026-09-18; window 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18; artifact 8fa38e54dd0a.

arxiv.org appeared as a cited source in 410 of 15,782 monitored answer runs (2.60%) from 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18.

## Overall Evidence

- Citation rate: 2.60%
- Cited runs: 410 of 15,782
- Days cited: 69 of 125
- Engine breadth: 6 observed engines (chatgpt, claude, gemini, google_ai_mode, google_ai_overviews, perplexity)
- Confidence: Confidence A
- Standing: #10 of 22,179 observed domains

## Observed Segments

| Category | Question shape | State | Cited runs | Observed runs | Run dates | Rate | Confidence | Standing |
|---|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/best_x) | published | 14 | 77 | 7 | 18.18% | Unavailable | #6 of 204 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/how_choose) | published | 32 | 106 | 7 | 30.19% | Unavailable | #2 of 258 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/is_x_worth) | published | 18 | 106 | 7 | 16.98% | Unavailable | #5 of 265 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/problem_first) | published | 16 | 106 | 7 | 15.09% | Unavailable | #3 of 212 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/top_list) | published | 11 | 108 | 7 | 10.19% | Unavailable | #21 of 270 |
| [AI Infrastructure](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-infrastructure/x_vs_y) | published | 12 | 108 | 7 | 11.11% | Unavailable | #10 of 231 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/best_x) | published | 52 | 136 | 7 | 38.24% | Unavailable | #1 of 275 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/how_choose) | published | 21 | 130 | 7 | 16.15% | Unavailable | #4 of 305 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/is_x_worth) | published | 9 | 130 | 7 | 6.92% | Unavailable | #21 of 330 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/problem_first) | published | 18 | 106 | 7 | 16.98% | Unavailable | #2 of 272 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/top_list) | published | 22 | 106 | 7 | 20.75% | Unavailable | #5 of 313 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-security-privacy/x_vs_y) | published | 54 | 114 | 7 | 47.37% | Unavailable | #1 of 263 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/how_choose) | published | 1 | 113 | 7 | 0.88% | Unavailable | #174 of 448 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/is_x_worth) | published | 6 | 137 | 7 | 4.38% | Unavailable | #41 of 467 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/top_list) | published | 1 | 71 | 7 | 1.41% | Unavailable | #157 of 412 |
| [AI Visibility & GEO](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/ai-visibility-geo/x_vs_y) | published | 6 | 132 | 7 | 4.55% | Unavailable | #30 of 417 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/news_topic) | published | 7 | 623 | 54 | 1.12% | Unavailable | #153 of 1,340 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/problem_first) | published | 2 | 125 | 7 | 1.60% | Unavailable | #90 of 263 |
| [Cybersecurity](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/cybersecurity/x_vs_y) | published | 5 | 107 | 7 | 4.67% | Unavailable | #31 of 189 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Best tools](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/best_x) | published | 21 | 121 | 7 | 17.36% | Unavailable | #2 of 328 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/how_choose) | published | 8 | 130 | 7 | 6.15% | Unavailable | #20 of 195 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/is_x_worth) | published | 2 | 105 | 7 | 1.90% | Unavailable | #65 of 181 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/problem_first) | published | 5 | 104 | 7 | 4.81% | Unavailable | #17 of 157 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Top lists](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/top_list) | published | 10 | 106 | 7 | 9.43% | Unavailable | #13 of 279 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/deep-tech-hardware/x_vs_y) | published | 5 | 105 | 7 | 4.76% | Unavailable | #33 of 171 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/how_choose) | published | 1 | 99 | 7 | 1.01% | Unavailable | #104 of 172 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/news_topic) | published | 1 | 596 | 53 | 0.17% | Unavailable | #683 of 1,375 |
| [Enterprise Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software) | [Problem-first research](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/enterprise-software/problem_first) | published | 1 | 106 | 7 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #117 of 258 |
| [Family Software](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/family-software/how_choose) | published | 1 | 104 | 7 | 0.96% | Unavailable | #99 of 153 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/is_x_worth) | published | 1 | 108 | 7 | 0.93% | Unavailable | #107 of 206 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/news_topic) | published | 8 | 616 | 53 | 1.30% | Unavailable | #136 of 1,531 |
| [Fintech](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech) | [Comparisons](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/fintech/x_vs_y) | published | 6 | 102 | 7 | 5.88% | Unavailable | #25 of 136 |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [Is it worth it](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/is_x_worth) | collecting | 2 | 101 | 6 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [Healthcare Services](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/healthcare-services/news_topic) | published | 2 | 613 | 53 | 0.33% | Unavailable | #409 of 1,264 |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [How buyers choose](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/how_choose) | collecting | 4 | 71 | 5 | Unavailable | Unavailable | Collecting observations; no mature rank |
| [HR & Talent](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/hr-talent/news_topic) | published | 2 | 608 | 53 | 0.33% | Unavailable | #407 of 1,249 |
| [Legacy News Topics](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/legacy-unmapped) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/legacy-unmapped/news_topic) | published | 20 | 2,138 | 54 | 0.94% | Unavailable | #135 of 4,025 |
| [Martech & Advertising](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/martech-advertising) | [News-driven citations](https://machinerelations.ai/index/categories/martech-advertising/news_topic) | published | 3 | 602 | 53 | 0.50% | Unavailable | #289 of 1,244 |

## Citation

Arxiv.org (arxiv.org), 2.60% citation rate, 410 of 15,782 monitored answer runs, 2026-05-10 to 2026-09-18, mri_score_v2.0, mri_score_v2.0+2026-09-18+8fa38e54dd0a, https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/arxiv.org.

## Public Boundary

The public dataset reports citation rates, rankings, and evidence counts. It excludes internal query identifiers, raw cited URLs, and answer-engine provider payloads. MRI measures observed root-domain citations in monitored prompts; it does not measure all AI answers, recommendation quality, website traffic, or commercial performance. A citation does not prove source support, and MRI confidence is not an Answer-Source Fidelity grade.

## Related Sources

- [Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/index)
- [Public JSON artifact](https://machinerelations.ai/data/machine-relations-index.json)
- [Release manifest](https://machinerelations.ai/data/mri-release-manifest.json)
- [AuthorityTech publication intelligence projection](https://authoritytech.io/publications.md) — Practitioner projection derived from the neutral Machine Relations Index. It is not source evidence, citation provenance, or sameAs identity for the neutral dataset.